Page 224 - SAHCS HIVMed Journal Vol 20 No 1 2019
P. 224

Page 5 of 6  Original Research


              standard test. In contrast, AST:ALT ratio performance was not   In conclusion,  this  is the  first  study in  Zimbabwe  to
              comparable to any of the other three algorithms, showing poor   demonstrate that algorithms such as FIB4-index, APRI test
              agreement with any of the three algorithms. Therefore,  we   and FibroTest together with individual serum biomarkers
              speculate that this discordance could be owing to overexpression   like A-2M can be used as alternative methods for assessing
              of AST from non-hepatic sources and also delayed clearance of   liver fibrosis in asymptomatic, HIV-infected individuals on
              AST relative to ALT. 35,36  Thus, making AST-based algorithms   ART. The moderately high prevalence of asymptomatic liver
              problematic in assessing liver fibrosis by overestimating the   fibrosis obtained in this study warrants adequate monitoring
              degree of liver fibrosis. AST:ALT ratio consequently becomes a   among  ART-experienced individuals. The discordance of
              very unreliable test for estimating significant fibrosis in ART-  fibrosis results among the algorithms, and individual
              experienced individuals. Among the comparable algorithms,   biomarkers call for further work in identifying optimal
              FIB-4 index is the best in terms of reliability and ease of   biomarkers for detection of asymptomatic fibrosis. However,
              performing because it includes age in its calculations and the   AST:ALT ratio does not require further work, as it has been
              tests involved in calculation are routinely available.   shown to be an unreliable test for assessing liver fibrosis.
                                                                                                                   16
                                                                    Whilst a number of studies, including the Ugandan study,
              We compared individual biomarkers between fibrotic and   have  demonstrated  high  levels  of fibrosis  in  HIV-
              non-fibrotic individuals as defined by the FibroTest and APRI   monoinfected patients, the natural history and long-term
              test to determine the possible utility of using a single biomarker   liver outcomes in this group of patients have not been well
              in prediction of fibrosis. Only  AST and  A2M remained   described. There is, therefore, an urgent need to have well-
              significantly higher in patients with liver fibrosis compared to   designed cohort studies looking at long-term outcomes in
              those without, adjusting for multiple comparisons. We   this group of patients and an easy to apply non-invasive test
              therefore speculate that the observed significance could be   in this setting. Introducing better non-invasive markers of
              because of the fact that (1) most of the AST in hepatocytes is   liver fibrosis in Zimbabwe and sub-Saharan  Africa has a
              located in the mitochondria and damage to hepatocytes causes   potential of simplifying and improving the way  ART-
              the release of both the cytoplasmic and mitochondrial AST,   experienced patients are monitored for liver fibrosis.
              leading  to  a  raised  AST in  liver  fibrosis,   and  (2) alpha-2
                                               35
              macroglobulin, a PI, is produced by hepatocytes, granuloma   Acknowledgements
              cells and hepatic stellate cells during inflammation. Hence, its
              synthesis is increased as the body tries to inhibit breakdown of   The authors would like to thank the Letten foundation for
              ECM proteins, which favours fibrosis.  In our study, A-2M   funding this project and all the participants for participating
                                            37
              was able to strongly distinguish fibrosis from non-fibrosis and   in this study. The authors extend their gratitude to the
              this has also been demonstrated in a study conducted   personnel of the Department of Chemical Pathology, College
                        37
              in  Romania.   Aspartate aminotransferase significantly   of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe for all the
              distinguished fibrosis from non-fibrosis, but the enzyme is not   support throughout the whole project.
              a good individual biomarker of liver fibrosis as it is not solely
              produced by the liver and this results in false-positives. On the   Competing interests
              contrary, A-2M is an excellent individual biomarker of liver
              fibrosis, but analysis of this protein is costly, thus making it not   The authors declare that they have no financial or personal
              ideal for routine assessment of liver fibrosis in poor resource   relationship(s) which may have inappropriately influenced
              settings.                                             them in writing this article.

              This study was limited by the unavailability of liver LB,   Authors’ contributions
              which  is  the  gold  standard  method  for  assessing  liver
              fibrosis. We could not assay LB on our patients as it is   B.N., K.M., Prof. B.S.-P. and Prof. H.T.M. conceived the study
              ethically unacceptable for routine monitoring of liver   and its design. B.N.,  A.M. and T.K.N. participated in the
              fibrosis, particularly in the HIV-infected individuals because   collection of clinical material and study participant
              it increases the risks of coagulopathies. 8,35,38  However,   recruitment. B.N., A.M. and C.M. conducted laboratory tests.
              including LB in our study could have potentially helped us   B.N., P.T.M. and K.M. performed data analysis. B.N. wrote
              in drawing a stronger conclusion on the diagnostic    the first draft with inputs from K.M., T.K., A.M., C.M., P.T.M.,
              performance of each algorithm. Transient elastography was   Prof. H.T.M. and Prof. B.S.-P.  All authors reviewed and
              going to be a better comparator among the non-invasive   approved the final version of the manuscript.
              tools of assessing liver fibrosis. However, the test was not
              performed owing to a lack of availability of the test and also   References
              budget constraints. Cut-off values used in our study were
              based on studies performed mainly in Europe, with most   1.  Spearman CW, Sonderup MW. Health disparities in liver disease in sub-Saharan
                                                                      Africa. Liver Int. 2015;35(9):2063–2071. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.12884
              participants having HCV. 18,39  Although we have no reason to   2.  Price JC, Thio CL. Liver disease in the HIV-coinfected individual. Clin Gastroenterol
              believe that the cut-off values would differ in our setting,   Hepatol. 2010;8(12):1002–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2010.08.024
              studies to validate the cut-off values in an African population   3.  Weber R, Sabin CA, Friis-Møller N, et al. Liver-related deaths in persons infected
                                                                      with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus: The D: A: D study. Arch Intern Med.
              are recommended.                                        2006;166(15):1632–1641. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.15.1632

                                           http://www.sajhivmed.org.za 217  Open Access
   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229