Page 262 - HIVMED_v21_i1.indb
P. 262

Page 5 of 7  Original Research


                 ‘It’s a paradigm shift, how we used to work in the past, and now   While the introduction and potential of electronic TB data at
                 we don’t work like that anymore. It’s tough, because  many   facility level can be considered an important step forward for
                 colleagues don’t trust the process; they’re used to a different   the  TB  programme,  many of  the  participants  recounted
                 process. It is our responsibility as senior managers to turn those   strong initial reactions and resistance towards the proposed
                 heads.’ (Participant 20, male, TB manager, 15 September 2016)
                                                                    change that affected the efficiency and effectiveness of
                                                                    implementation. These anxieties and resistances were
              Given the breadth of the proposed change that some
              participants felt  the  electronic  facility level  TB  register   concerned with: firstly, the vertical position of the TB
              ushered in, participants at sub-district and district   programme and TB programme data which ushered in
              management  levels spoke about the need for  change   changes to staff’s conventional,  familiar  roles and
              management:                                           responsibilities; secondly, with perceptions about the ‘new’
                                                                    electronic register as deleterious and unnecessary and the
                 ‘When introducing something, come with change management   ‘old’ paper-based register as functional and reliable; and
                 to enable the people to grasp it and to internalise it. You get it   thirdly how adoption of the new register would be facilitated,
                 today, and tomorrow must implement it. And that’s why people
                 put up these walls. Resistance, resistance.’ (Participant 14,   which participants felt lacked a process whereby they could
                 female, TB manager, 05 August 2016)                internalise the proposed change.

              For staff at facility level, one of the most challenging aspects   We make three recommendations for facilitating the
              of implementation was related to their historic use of   transition to an electronic TB register at facility level in South
              paper-based registers and subsequent underexposure and   Africa and for moving to integrated electronic systems in
              distrust of technology. Some participants also voiced concerns   general.
              over the safety of electronic data during power outages, in
              case of computer theft and possible system failures. As such,   Firstly, implementers must invest in a process of change
              computer literacy at facility level was a consistent concern of   management alongside the transition to electronic facility
              participants at all levels of the health system:      level TB data in South Africa. Kuhn and Giuse define change
                                                                    management as ‘the process of assisting individuals and
                 ‘I think one of the shortcomings [in rolling out further] will be that   organizations in passing from an old way of doing things to
                 colleagues aren’t excited about technology or that they are not            23
                 ready to embrace computers.’ (Participant 12, male, TB manager,   a new way of doing things’.  To be successful, a change
                 23 August 2016)                                    management process should involve the management of the
                                                                    practical aspects of the change (e.g. resources and training),
              The question ‘Who is best-placed to capture TB data?’ divided   and should address how the change might challenge the
              TB stakeholders into two camps: those advocating for TB   sense of security, confidence and identity that individuals
                                                                                                                 24,25
              clinicians to continue to capture data and those advocating   associate with the conventional or old way of doing things.
              for the responsibility to be handed over to clerks as is the   In the South African example, such a change management
              practice  in  the  HIV  programme.  In  the  two facilities  with   process must endeavour to achieve buy-in across all levels of
              smaller patient numbers, the TB clinicians had quickly   the healthcare system by identifying  the individuals or
              become adept at capturing TB data into the electronic register   groups who will be affected by the change, and creating a
              and drawing reports. At the time of the evaluation, clinicians   space in which their anxieties can be voiced, acknowledged
              in all three facilities were either responsible for or assisting   and  addressed.  This  process  could  be  facilitated  by
              with capturing TB data and were regularly accessing reports   showcasing experiences and outcomes from pilot sites and
              on the system.                                        providing practical examples of how challenges can be
                                                                    mediated and resolved. In other TB treatment contexts, such
              Discussion                                            a change management process should involve prior formative
                                                                    research, which can include desk research, to establish the
              There  are  numerous  factors  that  influence  transition  from   health and political context within which the TB programme
              paper to electronic records and information systems in health   is required to transition. In particular, this involves
              services. 13,16,17  These include  organisational culture, for   establishing  how  existing  TB  programmes  and  systems
              instance, readiness of the organisation and its end users to   function, the relational nuances between people and
              adopt a new technology, 18,19  the ability of the innovation to   programmes that might affect implementation (as is the case
              integrate with existing, conventional workflows or to require   between the HIV and TB programmes in South Africa) and
                                                                    people’s loyalties to particular ways of operating within the
              changes to it, 19,20,21  and more practical aspects such as   TB programme.
              computer literacy of staff which may influence how confident
              they feel to successfully implement the innovation.  As such,   Secondly, individuals driving implementation should
                                                      15
              even  a  seemingly  simple  replacement  of  a  paper-based   include individuals from within the TB programme in order
              register with an electronic one may bring about important   to bring expert knowledge of the existing system and to lend
              shifts in power for different users by requiring adapted   credibility to the proposed change. Implementers should
              skillsets, resulting in complex changes to the status quo.   directly  address  the  potential  challenges  of  transitioning,
              These factors ultimately shape the response of those affected   work with staff to set realistic expectations of individuals’
                                 22
              by the proposed change.                               roles and responsibilities and how these may change with
                                           http://www.sajhivmed.org.za 254  Open Access
   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267