Page 230 - HIVMED_v21_i1.indb
P. 230

Page 3 of 11  Review Article








                        Strength/weakness of design  To their knowledge this was the first study  to use two sequential cross-sectional  surveys to compare implementation of  policies on ART access and retention across  six African countries with a generalised HIV   epidemic. The conceptual framework that  underpinned this study was developed  prior to the first facility survey round and  was based on a review of literature and  policy in circulation up to 2015. Whilst  comprehensive at the time, the pr













                        Major outcomes of study  Although expansion of ART access  was explicitly stated in all countries’  policies, most lacked policies that   enhanced retention. The proportion of facilities that  initiated ART at CD4 counts of 500 or  less cells/mm 3  increased from 12% to   68%. Treatment stock-outs affected  increase in ART enrolment. Facilities initiating patients onto 2013  WHO recommended ART-regimen  increased from 42% to 87%.  This report highlights the continuing  gaps in AR













                        Study location  Kenya, Malawi, South Africa,   Tanzania, Uganda and   Zimbabwe  Angola, Botswana,  Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire,  Democratic Republic of the  Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya,   Lesotho, Malawi,  Mozambique, Namibia,  Nigeria, Rwanda, South   Africa, South Sudan,  Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda,   Zambia and Zimbabwe  Rural KwaZulu Natal,   South Africa









                        Study focus  Inclusion of the 2013   WHO HIV treatment   recommendations  The study analysed the  levels of WHO guidelines  implementation of ART  initiation and how countries  timeously changed and  adopted country guidelines.  The study aimed at  describing ART initiation  percentages in a large HIV  programme according to  the temporal changes of   country ART eligibility  guidelines from 2007 to   2012.




                        Type of study  Cross-  sectional   survey  Cross-  sectional   survey  Cross-  sectional   study.







                        Study objectives  The study assessed the  uptake of the 2013 WHO  recommendations related  to the eligibility threshold   for ART-initiation, the   availability of first-line   ART- regimens, and   recommendations to   improve retention.  To understand the lag   between guideline   development and  implementation, as well as   the ART coverage gap,   CDC assessed national   HIV-guidelines and   analysed Joint United  Nations Programme on   HIV and AIDS. Timeliness of WHO-ART  gui








                        Theme identified  Timely implementation of  WHO and ART initiation  policy guidelines at country   level. Adoption of WHO and ART  initiation policy guidelines at   country level Barriers and facilitators to  WHO-policy implementation  Timely implementation of  WHO and ART initiation  policy guidelines at country   level Adoption of WHO and ART  initiation policy guidelines at   country level Barriers and facilitators to  WHO-policy implementation  Adoption of WHO and ART  initia



                      TABLE 1: Summary of studies.  Guidelines   Author   year  and year  2013  Paper 1  2013  Burrage   Paper 2  2010 and   2013  Paper 3







                             et al. 13
                            Ambia
                                                    et al. 14
                                                                          Plazy
                               2017
                                                      2018
                                           http://www.sajhivmed.org.za 222  Open Access et al. 15  2015
   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235