Page 400 - SAHCS HIVMed Journal Vol 20 No 1 2019
P. 400

Page 5 of 7  Original Research


              TABLE 3: Factors associated with vaginal practices during follow-up.
              Variable                                              Univariate                      Multivariate
                                                   N or median   % or IQR  OR   95% CI  p      OR      95% CI   p
              Participant age (years) at enrolment    22     21–24  1.0535   0.8933–1.2426  0.5357  -   -        -
              Do you have any main sexual partners?
              Yes                                     49     98%    Ref.      -         -      -        -        -
              No                                      1       2%   7.8729   5.5694–11.1291  <0.0001  -  -        -
              Age (years) of main partner             27     24–29  1.0007   0.9092–1.1014  0.9883  -   -        -
              Do you have any casual sexual partners?
              Yes                                     48     96%   4.5461   1.0118–20.4254  0.0482  -   -        -
              No                                      2       4%    Ref       -         -      -        -        -
              In the last 30 days, how many times have you had vaginal sex   3   2–3  0.9904   0.9664–1.0150  0.4421  -  -  -
              with your main and/or casual and/or new partner?
              Condom use in the last 30 days, during vaginal sex with your main and/or casual and/or new partner
              Consistently                            12     24%    Ref.      -         -      Ref.     -        -
              Inconsistently                          38     76%   3.4086   1.5306–7.5906  0.0027  3.3860   1.6980–8.7748  0.0013
              Transactional sex in the last 30 days with your main and/or casual and/or new partner
              Yes                                     21     42%   1.1635   0.5723–2.3656  0.6757  -    -        -
              No                                      29     58%    Ref.      -         -      -        -        -
              The last time you had sex, whom did you have sex with?
              Casual partner                          6      12%   2.5242   1.0593–6.0154  0.0366  3.0285   1.5610–5.8756  0.0010
              Main partner                            44     88%    Ref.      -         -      Ref.     -        -
              Genital tract infection (test results)
              Positive                                19     38%   0.9189   0.4490–1.8804  0.8169  -    -        -
              Negative                                31     62%     -        -         -      -        -        -
              IQR, interquartile range; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

              partner prior to enrolment versus a main partner (OR: 3.03,   genital cleansing to women in urban areas like Soweto. These
              95% CI: 1.56–5.88) had a higher odds of reporting VP. The   products are promoted as having been designed to cleanse,
              presence of a laboratory-confirmed GTI was not associated   relieve  irritation  or itching  and  decrease  odour.  Such
              with VP over time.                                    messaging reinforces VP as ‘normative’ and ignores the
                                                                    evidence that the vagina is self-cleansing.
                                                                                                    37
              Discussion
                                                                    The reporting of VP decreased over time during the study
              Our study shows  that VP are  common  among Sowetan   despite the absence of a structured, standardised intervention.
              women at risk of HIV acquisition, but can be reduced within   While this may have been because of social reporting bias,
              a relatively short period of time. In addition, we show that   another possible explanation may be the basic education
              sex with a casual partner increases the odds of vaginal   provided by clinicians who routinely informed participants
              hygiene practices.                                    engaging in VP that the vagina is self-cleansing and that VP
                                                                    could harm the vaginal mucosa leading to increased risk
              Although our study did not explore motivations, vaginal   for infections. They also cautioned participants against self-
              hygiene is the most common reported reason for VP used by   medicating perceived offensive odours as these could indicate
              both African and non-African women alike. A cross-sectional   GTIs requiring prescription medication. The only other study
              study in Cape Town, South  Africa, which enrolled 2897   in South African women that assessed VP over time showed
              women, found that 29% used VP, 53% of whom did so for   only a 10% decrease in VP during the study despite VP being
              regular hygiene purposes.  In Tanzania, more than 99% of   discouraged as part of counselling at each quarterly study
                                   23
              women reporting VP did so for hygiene reasons.  Other   visit.  Because reduction in VP was less likely in women in
                                                       16
                                                                       30
              common reasons for VP include pre- or post-coitally for   the intervention arm, which included a diaphragm and
              hygiene or to enhance sexual pleasure. 17,25,26,33,34  microbicide gel, the authors hypothesised that the reason for
                                                                    the difference between the arms may have been because of the
              Half the women in our study reported engaging in some   manual insertion and removal of the diaphragm, increased
              form of VP, most commonly washing with water and with   post-coital discharge from the gel or perceived cleansing
              fingers inside the vagina. This is similar to other studies in   properties of the gel. In Zambia, an interventional study to
              high-risk women in sub-Saharan  Africa, including other   decrease intra-VP in women living with HIV was unable to
              regions of South Africa. In Gambia, Zambia and Tanzania, VP   show significant decline after 8 weeks in either the control (a
              are considered part of routine hygiene. 16,17,35   In KwaZulu-  3–5-min brief message advising women not to engage in VP)
              Natal Province of South  Africa, VP were shown to be a   or intervention (a 20–30-min socio-educational intervention)
              learned or cultural practice  passed down in families. 29,36    groups.  In our study, visits were more frequent, occurring
                                                                          35
              This  may also be the case in Sowetan women.  Another   1–4 weeks apart, perhaps indicating that to meaningfully
              exacerbating factor might be the influence of increased   reduce these culturally ingrained, normative practices,
              advertising and availability of feminine hygiene products for   frequent and consistent messaging is needed.

                                           http://www.sajhivmed.org.za 393  Open Access
   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405