Page 391 - HIVMED_v21_i1.indb
P. 391

Page 7 of 11  Original Research


              TABLE 7: Independent t-tests for adolescent HIV self-management across categories of viral suppression and adherence.
              AdHIVSM-35                                  n        Mean       SD         T         DF         p
              VL suppressed < 50
              Yes                                        197       80.56      9.52      2.376      305       0.02
              No                                         110       77.90      9.22       -          -         -
              Adherent (Likert item 1 – last missed dose)
              Yes                                        130       82.43      9.04      4.435      336       <0.001
              No                                         208       77.91      9.19       -          -         -
              Adherent (Likert item 2 – average adherence)
              Yes                                        160       81.97      9.21      4.444      336       <0.001
              No                                         178       77.54      9.08       -          -         -
              Consistent condom use
              Yes, using condoms every time              46        81.15      8.59      1.947      95        0.05
              No, inconsistent condom use                51        77.58      9.38       -          -         -
              Multiple sexual partners
              Yes, more than one partner                 27        77.86      9.73      –1.187     78        0.24
              One partner only                           53        80.44      8.95       -          -         -
              Source:  Based on Crowley T. The development of an instrument to measure adolescent HIV self-management in the context of the Western Cape, South Africa.  [unpublished thesis]. Cape town:
              Stellenbosch University; 2018
              AdHIVSM, adolescent HIV self-management; SD, standard deviation; DF, degrees of freedom.
              community, knowing the names of one’s  ARVs or one’s
                                                                                        Proximal
              VL,  showing interest in understanding one’s VL and        Process        outcomes        Distal outcomes
              remembering to take treatment (not relying on other people
              to remind them). The sub-scales with the lowest mean
              percentage scores were  Biomedical management and  Coping                 Non-      –0.14*
                                                                                      adherent
              and self-regulation (Table 6). Participants who indicated that   –0.34**  behaviour          Health-
              they did not know how they were infected had significantly                                   related
              lower self-management scores compared to those who knew                                     quality of
                                                                                                            life
              (t[115.15] = –2.299, p = 0.02).
                                                                        Adolescent      0.45**
                                                                         HIV Self-
              Adolescent HIV self-management had  a correlation         management
              coefficient of medium strength with HRQoL (r = 0.450,                                    0.17*  –0.08
              p  <  0.01) and a negative correlation with non-adherent             –0.03      –0.09
              behaviour (r = –0.249,  p < 0.01). The sub-scale of self-
              management with the strongest correlation with HRQoL                    Sexual risk
              was Goals and facilitation, which includes setting goals, but   *, p < 0.05  behaviour   0.15*  Viral load log
                                                                      **, p < 0.01
              importantly, obtaining support from family, friends and
              healthcare workers. Participation or being actively involved
              in one’s care and in social pursuits was the sub-scale that   FIGURE 3: Partial least squares structural model.
              had the strongest negative correlation with non-adherent
              behaviour.                                            association with HRQoL. There also   appears to be a
                                                                    positive correlation between sexual risk behaviour and the
              Adolescents who reported higher HIV self-management were   VL level (r = 0.15, p < 0.05).
              more likely to be adherent to treatment (t = 4.435 [336], p < 0.01),
              virally  suppressed  (t  =  2.376  [305],  p  =  0.02)  and  practise   The relationship between self-management and sexual
              consistent condom use (t = 1.947 [95], p = 0.05) (Table 7).  behaviour was not significant.


              Structural equation modelling model                   Discussion
              Figure 3 shows the PLS structural model indicating a   The current study explored relationships between variables
              significant relationship between self-management and   based on a framework developed from the IFSMT and
              HRQoL (r = 0.45,  p < 0.01). Non-adherent behaviour   therefore cause and effect relationships cannot be inferred.
              appears to mediate the relationship between self-     However, the findings of this study support the theory and
              management and viral suppression. As shown in Figure 3,   previous systematic reviews that higher self-management
              non-adherent behaviour was negatively correlated with   may influence treatment adherence, certain health
              self-management (r = –0.34,  p < 0.01) and positively   behaviours, HRQoL and treatment outcome. 12,19,20,21  The
              correlated with VL log (r = 0.17, p < 0.05). This means that   limitation identified in systematic reviews has been that most
              lower  self-management  is  associated  with  more  non-  self-management  interventions  had no theoretical  basis. 12,20
              adherent behaviour  which,  in  turn, influences  VL levels.   The findings of this study may indicate that interventions
              Non-adherent behaviours had a moderate negative       that  have  a  comprehensive  focus,  that  include  components  to

                                           http://www.sajhivmed.org.za 383  Open Access
   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396