Page 382 - HIVMED_v21_i1.indb
P. 382

Page 7 of 9  Original Research


              the minimal differences in treatment outcomes between the   comparable to rates reported in other studies that assessed
              adolescents in the Teen Club and those in standard care.   treatment outcomes in adolescents receiving treatment in
              Modification of the Teen Club to an Adolescents Treatment   adolescent-friendly HIV services.
              Adherence Club with special arrangements for pill pickups,
              clinical monitoring and fast-tracking of consultations with   In addition, our study also sought to establish any
              health care workers may provide additional benefits and   associations between retention rates and other demographic
              improve uptake of the intervention. Overall, having a   and clinical characteristics of the adolescents receiving
              specialised paediatric HIV clinic demonstrated that improved   treatment at the clinic. Of note, significant differences were
              treatment outcomes can be achieved among adolescents,   found between younger and older adolescents, which is in
              which is imperative to close the gap towards achieving the   line with what has been reported elsewhere globally that
              90–90–90 goals. National programmes must consider     younger adolescents have better retention rates than older
              decentralising  paediatric  and adolescent-friendly  HIV   adolescents. The results also showed that HIV disclosure is a
              services,  and  individual-based  interventions  could  key factor in improving retention rates among adolescents
              substantially  improve  retention  rates  among  adolescents,   on  ART. These results may only apply to this particular
              and close the gap between this underserved group and that   study population and setting. However, effectiveness of the
              of children and adults.                               intervention can reasonably be generalised to ALHIV who
                                                                    are accessing ART at a specialised adolescent-friendly ART
              Limitations of the study                              clinic. We concluded that in a specialised paediatric  ART
                                                                    clinic, group-based interventions may not substantially
              The use of a retrospective cohort study design meant that we
              had to rely on the accuracy of the record-keeping by the   improve retention rates among adolescents on ART. Targeted,
              health care workers. Reliance on routinely collected data   individual and age-specific interventions may provide
              meant that we could not control the exposures and outcomes   additional benefits to the Teen Club intervention, particularly
              of interest. The level of exposure to the intervention could   among older adolescents. Modification of this Teen Club
              have also affected the results, as those adolescents who   model to include dedicated clinic time, peer mentorship,
              attended at least one Teen Club meeting were considered to   ART refill and additional treatment adherence support may
              have been exposed to the intervention. The inclusion of   also improve overall treatment outcomes. The results
              adolescents transferred out in the non-retention group may   provide preliminary data that can be a vehicle for further
              have affected the results; however, the numbers were small   research, modification of the intervention and development
              and were not significantly different between the two groups.   of future prospective studies.
              The amount of missing data and files could have potentially
              influenced the findings of the study. However, it was   Acknowledgements
              predominantly some viral load results that were missing on   Competing interests
              the ePMS but filed in the PCBs, and 13 (3.4%) of the adolescents
              did not have a disclosure status recorded. The inequivalence   The authors declare that they have no financial or personal
              in sample sizes between the comparison groups (Teen Club   relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them
              Members vs. adolescents in standard care) could also   in writing this article.
              potentially result in a type II error.
                                                                    Authors’ contributions
              Conclusions                                           F.K.M. developed the study concept and design and

              Worldwide, adolescents on ART are reportedly at higher risk   conducted the field work and data analysis. F.K.M. and
              of non-retention in HIV care, compared to children and adults.   B.v.W. contributed to study conceptualisation and refining,
              Studies have shown that adolescent-friendly HIV services can   and eventually co-wrote the manuscript.
              lead to substantial improvements in treatment outcomes
              among  adolescents on  ART, which can be comparable to   Funding information
              treatment outcomes among children and adults. Peer support
              groups are reportedly an effective strategy to improve   This  research  received  no  specific  grant from any  funding
              treatment outcomes for individuals on ART in general. This   agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
              study sought to compare the retention in care rates between
              adolescents attending the Teen Club and those receiving   Data availability statement
              standard care during the period 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2017.  The primary data are available as extracted from the routine
                                                                    patient data system.
              Our study found no significant differences in retention rates
              between adolescents that were in the Teen Club and those in
              standard care, although there were slightly higher retention   Disclaimer
              rates among Teen Club members. Overall, retention rates   The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of
              were at 90.1% at 24 months among all adolescents included   the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or
              in the study, and these  relatively high  retention  rates are   position of any affiliated agency of the authors.

                                           http://www.sajhivmed.org.za 374  Open Access
   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387