Home
About
Celebrating 25 Years
Who we are
What we do
Our Board
Privacy policy
Our Donors and Partners
Learning Opportunities
Advanced Clinical HIV Management Course - for Doctors
Advanced HIV Management Online Course - for Nurses
PIMART Online Course
NIMART Online Course
Cryptococcal Meningitis Online Course
Gender-affirming healthcare training course
CME webinars
Partner Courses / Resources
SAHCS eLearning Platform
Resources
Digitized Guidelines for ARV Therapy in Adults
SAHCS Guidelines
Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine
SAJHIVMED e-book
HIV Nursing Matters
HIVNM e-book
PrEP resources
Partner Publications
Statements
HIV news
NDOH and WHO Guidelines
Other Guidelines
HCW PPE Shortages and Stockouts
The ITREMA project
Child and Adolescent Committee
Meetings
International Workshop on HIV Drug Resistance
SAHCS CONFERENCE - November 2023
Conference - The future of ARVs in Africa
Conference Presentations
Join / Login
Join
Member Login
Contact Us
Contact Us
Vacancies
Find an HIV Provider
DONATE
The Ethics of Charging User Fees for ART Initiation
At a large tertiary level hospital in South Africa, patients were in the past expected to contribute to the costs of their care by paying means-tested fees- per visit to an outpatient clinic, or per day in case of a hospitalisation. Fees started at R160 per visit for the lowest income tier. Patients were exempted from the payment if they could prove that they don't have a regular income. In practice, patients in the lowest income tier were accepted into the clinic for their first 3 visits, but had to bring proof of no income at their fourth visit at the latest. During the first year of the ART clinic's operation, this proof of income (or the absence of it) could have been a handwritten affidavit stamped at their local police station. During the second year, however, this policy was changed and patients had to supply a print-out from the employment registry at the Department of Labour. This lead to the clinic seeing an increase in the number of patients defaulting from treatment after their third visit. Patients were ?complaining that the new procedure meant that they had to travel to the city centre and queue for a day at the Department, or sometimes for several consecutive days, in order to obtain the necessary documentation. In October 2006, hospital fees were abolished completely for patients accessing the ART clinic, but patients were still expected to settle their outstanding fees for the period before this general exemption took hold.
Question 1: What would you say about the fee policy at this hospital?
A.
It is ethically sound to exempt patients from the hospital’s fee policy because patients needing ART are more likely to drop out of care and possibly die if they are in a system which charges fees for treatment.
B.
All patients attending tertiary care should be charged user fees, this is because tertiary care hospitals have higher overhead and need to access some form of financing to sustain their services.
C.
If ART patients get free care at the tertiary hospital, then all other patients going there should also get free care, regardless of if they are a chronic patient or not.
D.
Charging for HIV and other chronic care will prevent people from using the services when they are not really sick.
E.
ART patients should be exempt because they are usually poorer patients from underserved areas. However, exemption will not improve their ART-related outcomes.
Subscribe For Updates
×
Name
Surname
Mobile
Email Address
Profession